On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:27:13 -0600, Ed L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Shinji Teragaito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
I see Shinji's patch changed the library suffix from .sl to .so for
Shinji Teragaito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
I see Shinji's patch changed the library suffix from .sl to .so for ia64.
Is that is necessary? If so, why?
Thanks,
Ed
This has been applied and will be in beta3.
---
Shinji Teragaito wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:39:55 -0400, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Shinji Teragaito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made a patch to let
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:39:55 -0400, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Shinji Teragaito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
The s_lock change looks good ... but ...
This patch seems likely to
Hi,
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform. Also this patch contains
tas code for HP-UX Itanium.
I verified this patch on the following environment and specified as
followings at executing configure script:
* HP-UX
Shinji Teragaito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
The s_lock change looks good ... but ...
This patch seems likely to break many other platforms. You do not
seriously expect us to apply that
