NAKANO Yoshihisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> After looking at the test case a bit, I have an alternate approach:
>> constraints on the column will have DEPENDENCY_AUTO type, while
>> constraints using the column will have DEPENDENCY_NORMAL type.
> O.K. It seems nicer than my
Tom Lane wrote:
> After looking at the test case a bit, I have an alternate approach:
> constraints on the column will have DEPENDENCY_AUTO type, while
> constraints using the column will have DEPENDENCY_NORMAL type.
> Therefore, if we drop the NORMAL ones before the AUTO ones, that
> should be en
NAKANO Yoshihisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please find the patch attached. This is for the bug which is posted to
> hackers before.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg01442.php
> We can see a problem by this bug in following way.
> CREATE TABLE pktable (a int primary k
Hi,
Please find the patch attached. This is for the bug which is posted to
hackers before.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg01442.php
We can see a problem by this bug in following way.
CREATE TABLE pktable (a int primary key);
CREATE TABLE fktable (b int references pktabl
