> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Rocco Altier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please disregard this patch. I have a ton of lib%.exp and
> > similar files created currently.
>
> Yeah, that was one of the reasons I called it ugly :-(. I
> had put in
"Rocco Altier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please disregard this patch. I have a ton of lib%.exp and similar files
> created currently.
Yeah, that was one of the reasons I called it ugly :-(. I had put in an
"rm" step to get rid of lib%.so, you could probably fix the extraneous
.exp files simi
Of Rocco Altier
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:17 PM
> To: Tom Lane; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern
> rules from platform Makefiles
>
>
> The patch works on AIX with one small tweak to Makefile.shlib
> (attached
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 6:00 PM
> To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> Subject: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules
> from platform Makefiles
>
>
> I've wanted for a long time to get rid of the pattern rules in the
> port-specific Makefiles that generate
I've wanted for a long time to get rid of the pattern rules in the
port-specific Makefiles that generate shared libraries from single
object files. These patterns duplicate (or, more often, fail to
completely duplicate) the knowledge in Makefile.shlib. So from
a maintenance point of view centrali
