Re: [PATCHES] Remove second argument from textToQualifiedNameList

2005-05-26 Thread Neil Conway
Jaime Casanova wrote: i found out that the function textToQualifiedNameList doesn't use the second argument it receive (caller). i suppose in the past was used and now it is useless, if that is the case here is a patch removing. Or are any reasons to keep that argument? Applied to HEAD. Thanks

Re: [PATCHES] Remove second argument from textToQualifiedNameList

2005-05-25 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jaime Casanova wrote: >> Or are any reasons to keep that argument? > None that I can see. I'll apply the patch later today, barring any > objections. Looking at the 7.3 sources, the argument was used to support the then-existing convention that an error

Re: [PATCHES] Remove second argument from textToQualifiedNameList

2005-05-25 Thread Neil Conway
Jaime Casanova wrote: i found out that the function textToQualifiedNameList doesn't use the second argument it receive (caller). i suppose in the past was used and now it is useless, if that is the case here is a patch removing. Or are any reasons to keep that argument? None that I can see. I'l

[PATCHES] Remove second argument from textToQualifiedNameList

2005-05-25 Thread Jaime Casanova
Hi, i found out that the function textToQualifiedNameList doesn't use the second argument it receive (caller). i suppose in the past was used and now it is useless, if that is the case here is a patch removing. Or are any reasons to keep that argument? -- regards, Jaime Casanova (DBA: DataBase A