On 8/22/06, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am still waiting for some documentation on what XML support we have,
and what we need. We can't decide on this patch until we have that.
Here is my thoughts:
http://nikolay.samokhvalov.com/2006/08/23/xml-and-relational/
(maybe too much w
I'll prepare some classification of differend kinds of XML support,
including a brief overview for oracle, sql server and db2 (I'm a
person who works on that SoC project)
As for Pavel's patch, I think it's pretty complete piece of several
SQL/XML functions and could be usefull for people (e.g for
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There have been inquiries about some kind of XML support every few weeks
> for years now. Clearly, we need to sort out what that really means.
Agreed. We need a road map of some sort.
> I'm preparing a session about that for the Toronto summit.
Tom Lane wrote:
> If there were a serious amount of demand for the SQL2003 XML features
> then I wouldn't be averse to putting them in, but right now it looks
> like bloat with little redeeming social value. Who other than the
> submitter has asked for this? I don't even see "XML" listed in TODO.
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
> >
> >If there were a serious amount of demand for the SQL2003 XML features
> >then I wouldn't be averse to putting them in, but right now it looks
> >like bloat with little redeeming social value. Who other than the
> >submitter has asked for this? I don't even see
Hello
If there were a serious amount of demand for the SQL2003 XML features
then I wouldn't be averse to putting them in, but right now it looks
like bloat with little redeeming social value. Who other than the
submitter has asked for this? I don't even see "XML" listed in TODO.
1. integrati
Well, we have been pushing XML out of the database into side projects,
which I think is the way to go until we have an XML-standard export
format. With this one, I don't see how we can do it externally and meet
the spec. I would like to see an outline of what XML things we support
and what we d
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Do we want this XML patch in the backend? It needs syntax support so I
> don't see how it could be done in /contrib. Attached.
I think this could easily be done as an external module if it didn't
insist on random additions to the function-call syntax. AFAICS there
isn
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is part of the SQL standard.
>
> [ shrug ] There is a *boatload* of new stuff in SQL2003, most of which
> we probably won't ever implement. The foundation alone has enough new
> cruft to keep us busy for years ... never mind
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is part of the SQL standard.
[ shrug ] There is a *boatload* of new stuff in SQL2003, most of which
we probably won't ever implement. The foundation alone has enough new
cruft to keep us busy for years ... never mind stuff that shows up only
in
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think this could easily be done as an external module if it didn't
> > insist on random additions to the function-call syntax. AFAICS there
> > isn't anything there that couldn't be done without that.
>
> This is part of the SQL standard.
Ah, I sus
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think this could easily be done as an external module if it didn't
> insist on random additions to the function-call syntax. AFAICS there
> isn't anything there that couldn't be done without that.
This is part of the SQL standard.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgre
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Do we want this XML patch in the backend? It needs syntax support so I
> don't see how it could be done in /contrib. Attached.
I think this could easily be done as an external module if it didn't
insist on random additions to the function-call syntax. AFAICS there
isn't
Do we want this XML patch in the backend? It needs syntax support so I
don't see how it could be done in /contrib. Attached.
---
David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hell
This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > base type cha
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> base type changed to text, better registration xmlagg function
>
> Regards Pavel Stehule
Now with some slightly improved documentation, works vs. CVS tip as of
this writing.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> base type changed to text, better registration xmlagg function
Interesting. The SGML docs appear to be machine-generated stubs.
Could you point to a reference for them so they can be filled in?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter
Hello
base type changed to text, better registration xmlagg function
Regards
Pavel Stehule
_
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
diff -c -r ./pgsql.clean/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
18 matches
Mail list logo
