Re: [PATCHES] SQLSTATE again

2005-06-06 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello I have new version. I'll send it early. Regards Pavel Stehule On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > It will be applied as soon as one of the Postg

Re: [PATCHES] SQLSTATE again

2005-06-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
This patch is has been removed from the patch queue for the following reason: --- This patch is not ready to be applied -- we're waiting for Pavel to submit a revised version with the semantics described here: http://archiv

Re: [PATCHES] SQLSTATE again

2005-06-04 Thread Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian wrote: Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list This patch is not ready to be applied -- we're waiting for Pavel to submit a revised version with the semantics described here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00017.php -Neil

[PATCHES] SQLSTATE again

2005-05-30 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello I changed implementation of SQLSTATE from block scope variables on function scope variables. I am not sure if it's moust elegant solution, but is very similar Oracle behavior (there is session scope variable) CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ff() RETURNS void AS $$ BEGIN RAISE NOTICE 'No exce