Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 10:11 schrieb Bernd Helmle:
> so something like ALTER SCHEMA schema MOVE OBJECTS newschema?
> Sounds like a reasonable idea
I don't think the syntax should be altered. But a way to factor all these
common activities like moving, renaming, owner-altering for N classes
--On Donnerstag, Juni 01, 2006 23:03:39 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Not to be unkind,
Don't worry ;)
< but is this feature actually worth the code space?
I can barely see a use case for relocating operators, and as for the
other two, who's ever going to use them?
Well, i
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please find attached a patch that allows operator classes, operator and
> conversions
> to be moved between schemas. Regression and documentation patch included.
Not to be unkind, but is this feature actually worth the code space?
I can barely see a use
Please find attached a patch that allows operator classes, operator and
conversions
to be moved between schemas. Regression and documentation patch included.
--
Bernd
alter_schema.patch
Description: Binary data
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Ha
Please find attached a patch that allows operator classes, operator and
conversions
to be moved between schemas. Regression and documentation patch included.
[ sorry if that occurs twice, but my first attempt used the wrong identity
:( ]
--
Thanks
Bernd
alter_schema.pat