Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-10-01 Thread Marshall, Steve
I'm fine with Tom's wording and placement. This seems a bit wordy, as well as wrongly placed --- the time to tell people they need a non-multithreaded Tcl is in the installation instructions. I added the following instead. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Marshall, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Can you send in a patch against pltcl.sgml? >> > PL/TCL documentation patch is attached. This seems a bit wordy, as well as wrongly placed --- the time to tell people they need a non-multithreaded Tcl is in the installation i

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-10-01 Thread Marshall, Steve
Bruce Momjian wrote: Marshall, Steve wrote: The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc was added in TCL 8.2: In fact it was added in 8.4 so I have modified the CVS with the following patch. I confirmed this against the 8.2.5 release. Sorry I did not notice that

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marshall, Steve wrote: >> This is probably not a big problem, since TCL was not commonly compiled >> with multithreading enabled prior to 8.4. However, perhaps there should >> be a warning in the documentation on PL/TCL directing users to avoid >> linkin

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marshall, Steve wrote: > >The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc > >was added in TCL 8.2: > >In fact it was added in 8.4 so I have modified the CVS with > >the following patch. > > I confirmed this against the 8.2.5 release. Sorry I did not notice that > when I initiall

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Matt Newell wrote: > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:04, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > ** 178,184 > >* within Postgres, but we implement all the functions for completeness. > >* We can only fix this with Tcl >= 8.2, when Tcl_SetNotifier() appeared. > >*/ > > ! #if HAVE_TCL_VERSION(8,2) >

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Matt Newell
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:04, Bruce Momjian wrote: > ** 178,184 >* within Postgres, but we implement all the functions for completeness. >* We can only fix this with Tcl >= 8.2, when Tcl_SetNotifier() appeared. >*/ > ! #if HAVE_TCL_VERSION(8,2) You missed the 8.2 in the comme

Re: [PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Marshall, Steve
>The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc >was added in TCL 8.2: >In fact it was added in 8.4 so I have modified the CVS with >the following patch. I confirmed this against the 8.2.5 release. Sorry I did not notice that when I initially created the patch. While the patch

[PATCHES] TCL fix in HEAD

2007-09-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
The recent TCL patch assumed Tcl_NotifierProcs.initNotifierProc was added in TCL 8.2: #if HAVE_TCL_VERSION(8,2) /* * Override the functions in the Notifier subsystem. See comments above. */ { Tcl_NotifierProcs notifier;