Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> >
> > It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> > an
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> and approves it.
I applied a var
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ma
This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >>Bruce Momjian writes:
> >>
> >>>This has be
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
Uh, why do we need this at all? "NOT (tid = tid)" covers the
functionality already.
tid should be a fully functional type, at
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
>
> Uh, why do we need this at all? "NOT (tid = tid)" covers the
> functionality already.
tid should be a fully functional type, at least for = and !
Bruce Momjian writes:
> This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
Uh, why do we need this at all? "NOT (tid = tid)" covers the
functionality already.
I disagree strongly with renumbering existing hand-assigned OIDs for
this. There's t
This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>
> >
> > You also probably want to add the declaration for tidne() to
>
Neil Conway wrote:
You also probably want to add the declaration for tidne() to
include/utils/builtins.h
Doh! - Indeed, I obviously missed a few extra compile warnings!
Revised patch attached.
Index: src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c
===
On Mon, 2005-24-10 at 20:09 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> *** src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c 27 May 2005 00:57:49 - 1.49
> --- src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c 24 Oct 2005 02:34:51 -
> ***
> *** 174,180
> arg1->ip_posid == arg2->ip_
Please find enclosed a patch that adds a '<>' operator for tid types
(per TODO item). Patch is against current sources (beta4).
If I have understood the requirement properly, the relevant function
'tidne' already existed in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c, just needed an
ifdef NOT_USED removed. Th
11 matches
Mail list logo