Pavel Stehule wrote:
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust
same to USE_ISO_DATESTYLE.
I've installed this patch and made some additional adjustments so the
time zone format matches the XSD
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Hello,
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust same to
USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
ISO: -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
XSD: -mm-ddThh24:mi:ss
I found one link about this topic:
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust same to
USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
ISO: -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
XSD: -mm-ddThh24:mi:ss
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust same
to
USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
ISO: -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
XSD:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust
same to USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
ISO: -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
XSD: -mm-ddThh24:mi:ss
Pavel,
I
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust
same to USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
ISO: -mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
XSD:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 04:32:28PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am sorry. I reported this two times before. This patch is related only
for xml functionality. XSD datestyle is only one internal constant. There
are no new datestyle (I hope so can be usefull). My patch is small bug fix
like
I'm not sure that we are actually guaranteeing anything about XML validity
against any schema or DTD, are we?
what?
ofcourse you cannot garant validity against any schema. But mapping
functions are standardised and expect xsd. And I what I can meet protocols
based on xml, they respect xsd
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 04:32:28PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am sorry. I reported this two times before. This patch is related only
for xml functionality. XSD datestyle is only one internal constant.
There
are no new datestyle (I hope so can be usefull). My patch is small bug
fix
like
Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 16:54 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
I'm not sure that we are actually guaranteeing anything about XML
validity against any schema or DTD, are we?
That is the xmlschema part of table_to_xmlschema() et al. recently
discussed. That entire functionality hinges on producing
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 16:54 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
I'm not sure that we are actually guaranteeing anything about XML
validity against any schema or DTD, are we?
That is the xmlschema part of table_to_xmlschema() et al. recently
discussed. That entire
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] correct format for date, time, timestamp for XML
functionality
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:37:31 -0500
Peter Eisentraut
Pavel Stehule wrote:
xsd knows datetime type. You can inherit it, and then you have to
respect it. You can do own type, but you lost information, and any
general scripts don't understand. I don't know why xsd doesn't iso
format, but its simply fact. Please read this discussion:
14 matches
Mail list logo
