Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-09-05 Thread Andriy Tkachuk
seems to be little syntax problem: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied. Thanks. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: ... !para ! To avoid this situation, run productnamePostgreSQL/productname

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-09-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: It appears we are back in the you need a non-empty password mode. Anyway, here's the revised patch. andrew Andrew Dunstan wrote: I didn't find a single

[PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-08-22 Thread Andrew Dunstan
As discussed on Hackers. enjoy andrew Index: doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.200 diff -c -w -r1.200 runtime.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-08-22 Thread Neil Conway
Minor SGML gripes... On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:00:00AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: ! To avoid this situation, run postgres on a machine where you postgres should be productnamePostgreSQL/productname. ! altering the system's default behaviour. This can be determined ! by

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-08-22 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I didn't find a single instance of a warning tag in the doc sources. I did find a warning in an unadorned para, in func.sgml. Anyway, I made the changes (using note) but anoncvs is now refusing my login attempt, so I can't do the diff. I've spent way too much time on this already - really my

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-08-22 Thread Andrew Dunstan
It appears we are back in the you need a non-empty password mode. Anyway, here's the revised patch. andrew Andrew Dunstan wrote: I didn't find a single instance of a warning tag in the doc sources. I did find a warning in an unadorned para, in func.sgml. Anyway, I made the changes (using

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-08-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Andrew Dunstan writes: +para + Warning: using these settings in a kernel which does not support + these modes will almost certainly increase the danger of the + kernel killing the postmaster, rather than reducing it. + If in any doubt, consult a kernel expert