Re: [PATCHES] patches in the pipe?

Fabien COELHO wrote: Dear Bruce, (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions Would you repost and we can review it again. (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES]

[PATCHES] patches in the pipe?

Patch applied. Thanks. I have 3 others somehow minor patches that are being submitted: (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a

Re: [PATCHES] patches in the pipe?

Fabien COELHO wrote: (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions I thought Peter didn't like it. He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question. He may or may not agree, I don't know! Would you repost and we can review

Re: [PATCHES] patches in the pipe?

(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions I thought Peter didn't like it. He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question. He may or may not agree, I don't know! Would you repost and we can review it again. Ok. (2) Date:

Re: [PATCHES] patches in the pipe?

Fabien COELHO wrote: Patch applied. Thanks. I have 3 others somehow minor patches that are being submitted: (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions I thought Peter didn't like it. Would you repost and we can review it again.