Attached is a makefile I hacked up to build pg_config under MSVC - the
reason is that it's required (more or less) in order to build the latest
DBD::Pg code and I was testing that out under MSVC. Should be saved as
src/bin/pg_config/win32.mak if we're to be consistent. I haven't yet
done a patc
This has been saved for the 8.1 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Attached is a makefile I hacked up to build pg_config under MSVC - the
> reason is that it's r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 07 January 2005 05:33
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL)
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
>
>
> This has
> Dave Page wrote:
> Err, I missed this earlier - we had discussed getting rid of all
the> VC++ & Borland makefiles for 8.1. With Mingw now working they
are a> little redundant now, and Bruce & I (and probably others) had
to jump> through hoops to keep them working this release. Admittedley
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony and Bryn
ReinaSent: 07 January 2005 10:57To:
pgsql-patches@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC
makefile
> Dave Page wrote:
> Err, I missed this earlier - we had
dis
As far as I know, there have been no real benchmarks done, however,
pgAdmin now ships with a Mingw compiled libpq where previous versions
used a (static) VC++ one and I've neither noticed any difference myself,
or had any reports of poor performance on the pgAdmin lists (or
privately) from other us
Dave Page wrote:
> > > Attached is a makefile I hacked up to build pg_config under
> > MSVC - the
> > > reason is that it's required (more or less) in order to
> > build the latest
> > > DBD::Pg code and I was testing that out under MSVC.
>
> Err, I missed this earlier - we had discussed gett
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 January 2005 15:14
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL)
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
>
> I am not in favor of removing those makefiles in 8
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Err, I missed this earlier - we had discussed getting rid of all the
>> VC++ & Borland makefiles for 8.1. With Mingw now working they are a
>> little redundant now,
> I am not in favor of removing those makefiles in 8.1 unless they become
> more of a pa
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 January 2005 16:25
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Dave Page; Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL)
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
>
>
> > more of a pain. If people a
"Dave Page" writes:
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I recall proposing a couple months ago that we kill those makefiles,
>> but there was at least one objection at the time.
> My main concern is that they don't end up suffering terminal bit-rot
> because I stop helping maintain the
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 January 2005 17:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL)
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
>
> Don't feel that it's on yo
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 07 January 2005 15:14
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL)
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
&g
Patch applied. Thanks.
I also updated the top-level win32.mak for this.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Attached is a makefile I hacked up to build pg_config under MSVC - the
> reason is that it's required (more or less)
14 matches
Mail list logo
