Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
"George Gensure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The new function name is pg_conf_load_time() Applied with revisions. > I'm now using LWLocks only on the backend in order to protect the > PgReloadTime from mid copy reads. This may prove to be unnecessary, > since the code to handle HUPs seems to b

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread George Gensure
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > George Gensure escribió: > > > > So if nobody's got any further objections, could this patch be applied? > > It's in the queue: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:May > > -- > > > Alvaro Herrera

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
George Gensure escribió: > So if nobody's got any further objections, could this patch be applied? It's in the queue: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:May -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. --

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread George Gensure
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:58 PM, George Gensure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > George Gensure escribió: > > > > > > > I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the > > > administration TODO. I

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread George Gensure
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > George Gensure escribió: > > > > I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the > > administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but > > didn't want problems to occur with signals on the

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
George Gensure escribió: > I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the > administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but > didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the > read side. I'd say too much -- postmaster runs with signals blocke

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Gurjeet Singh wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, George Gensure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-29 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, George Gensure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the > administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but > didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the > read side. > > I

[PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-29 Thread George Gensure
I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the read side. -George *** ./doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.orig 2008-04-29 23:47:39.378726574 -0400 --- ./doc/