>I can test cygwin too. But just out of curiosity; why would
>anyone want
>to use cygwin with 8.0?
It runs on 9x, native requires NT. There are still a lot of ppl on 9x. I
wouldn't expect a production server on 9x (indeed not a server at all),
but certainly some desktops that are using it.
//Ma
Fabien COELHO wrote:
I have no mean to test that on a win32 machine. Could you do it?
Sure, I'll test it sometime tomorrow or the day after. I'll get back to you.
I'm wondering whether the MAKE_DLL fix should also be done under cygwin.
Any opinion?
I can test cygwin too. But just out of curio
Dear Thomas,
> I'm trying to change the Makefile system for PL/Java so that it uses
> PGXS instead of compiling using a complete PostgreSQL source tree. As it
> turns out, the directory "include/port/win32" is not present in the
> PostgreSQL binary installation. Without it, it's not possible to c