> "Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> One potential problem I see with the patch is that it opens lots of
> >> savepoints but does not release any.
>
> > Well, given that EXCEPTION blocks in Pl/pgSQL and the like also never
> > release savepoints
>
> That
"Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> One potential problem I see with the patch is that it opens lots of
>> savepoints but does not release any.
> Well, given that EXCEPTION blocks in Pl/pgSQL and the like also never
> release savepoints
That statement is flat
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Michael Paesold wrote:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00576.php
>
> One potential problem I see with the patch is that it opens lots of
> savepoints but does not release any. In this mode, given autocom
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Michael Paesold wrote:
> I am sorry for kind of reposting this, but I have not got any response to my
> patch sent for comment to hackers (Subject: Rollback on error):
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00576.php
>
> I just want to f
I am sorry for kind of reposting this, but I have not got any response to my
patch sent for comment to hackers (Subject: Rollback on error):
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00576.php
I just want to find out, if I should try to solve the issues with this patch
(and add regre
