FYI, the patch author and survey requestor has withdrawn the patch with
the following comment:
> I think we can reject this patch. I don't process yet output from survey
> on general, but it seems that more users prefer pg_ prefix, but idea of
> "pgc" command seems to be better. I think it is goo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:30:46 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which part of "this is the wrong list" wasn't clear to you guys?
I actually didn't even notice. Sorry Tom.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www
Which part of "this is the wrong list" wasn't clear to you guys?
regards, tom lane
-
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:12:19 -0700
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I have to had two reason for this patch. First is my personal,
> > because I don't like these names since 1999. And second is that
> > Solaris architects do not like
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 09:19:42PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
>>> * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
>>> http://archives.postgre
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
I think we need to make
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
> * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
> I think we need to make a decision.
Well, I
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
I think we need to make a decision.
--
Jaime Casanova wrote:
what makes me wonder why doesn't exist "pg_ctl init"
I suggested it in previous discussion on hackers. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00142.php
Zdenek
---(end of broadcast)--
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
But these u
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There is group of people who has different opinion. The main reasons for
this patch are 1) names could collide with system tools
That argument is purely theoretical, though, since no one has complained
to us of an *actual* collision. W
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
On 7/7/07, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may
have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't
recall ever using the others.
i used to use createlang before the pg_pltemplate exists (because i
hat
On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree
with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them
does
seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is ju
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is group of people who has different opinion. The main reasons for
> this patch are 1) names could collide with system tools
That argument is purely theoretical, though, since no one has complained
to us of an *actual* collision. With these utili
Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
> But these utilities
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser d
Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
I just want to say I disl
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> I'm also not sure we really should install copies on win32. Given how
>> seldom these commands are actually used on windows (most people really
>> use pgadmin to do these things).
>
> Postmaster does same thing.
Actually, the win32 distribution only ships postgres.exe, not
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
to
pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb pg_re
On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:28 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Why should they be name spaced? I see zero reason why that should
be the case...
apache_httpd?
gnu_ls?
Personally, I think that the Apache daemon *should* be named apached
or something along those lines.
Compare with postgres, pg_ctl, p
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexd
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
>> I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
>>
>> createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
>> vacuumdb reindexdb
>
> I just want to say I dislike t
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 06:59 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> I'm also not sure we really should install copies on win32. Given how
> seldom these commands are actually used on windows
But some people do use them, and they should have the same experience as on
any other platform. I don't think di
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
> I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
>
> createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
> vacuumdb reindexdb
I just want to say I dislike this idea.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
>
> createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
> vacuumdb reindexdb
>
> to
>
> pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
> pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb pg_reindexdb
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
to
pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb pg_reindexdb
Symlinks (or copy on win32) are c
29 matches
Mail list logo