FYI, the patch author and survey requestor has withdrawn the patch with
the following comment:
I think we can reject this patch. I don't process yet output from survey
on general, but it seems that more users prefer pg_ prefix, but idea of
pgc command seems to be better. I think it is good
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
I think we need to make a decision.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
I think we need to make a decision.
Well, I
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
I think we need to make
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 09:19:42PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:12:19 -0700
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I have to had two reason for this patch. First is my personal,
because I don't like these names since 1999. And second is that
Solaris architects do not like these
Which part of this is the wrong list wasn't clear to you guys?
regards, tom lane
-
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:30:46 -0400
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which part of this is the wrong list wasn't clear to you guys?
I actually didn't even notice. Sorry Tom.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997:
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is group of people who has different opinion. The main reasons for
this patch are 1) names could collide with system tools
That argument is purely theoretical, though, since no one has complained
to us of an *actual* collision.
Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
But these
Jaime Casanova wrote:
what makes me wonder why doesn't exist pg_ctl init
I suggested it in previous discussion on hackers. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00142.php
Zdenek
---(end of broadcast)---
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
to
pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I'm also not sure we really should install copies on win32. Given how
seldom these commands are actually used on windows (most people really
use pgadmin to do these things).
Postmaster does same thing.
Actually, the win32 distribution only ships postgres.exe, not
Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
I just want to say I
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
But these utilities are
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is group of people who has different opinion. The main reasons for
this patch are 1) names could collide with system tools
That argument is purely theoretical, though, since no one has complained
to us of an *actual* collision. With these
On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree
with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them
does
seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is
On 7/7/07, Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may
have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't
recall ever using the others.
i used to use createlang before the pg_pltemplate exists (because i
hate
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page wrote:
This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
seem somewhat
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
I just want to say I dislike this idea.
--
Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 06:59 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
I'm also not sure we really should install copies on win32. Given how
seldom these commands are actually used on windows
But some people do use them, and they should have the same experience as on
any other platform. I don't think
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
I just want to say I dislike this idea.
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 5:53 , Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser
On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:28 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Why should they be name spaced? I see zero reason why that should
be the case...
apache_httpd?
gnu_ls?
Personally, I think that the Apache daemon *should* be named apached
or something along those lines.
Compare with postgres, pg_ctl,
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
to
pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb pg_reindexdb
I attach complete patch which renames following binaries
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb
vacuumdb reindexdb
to
pg_createdb pg_createlang pg_createuser pg_dropdb pg_droplang
pg_dropuser pg_clusterdb pg_vacuumdb pg_reindexdb
Symlinks (or copy on win32) are
29 matches
Mail list logo
