Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I thought llast() and length() were going away too?
> For llast(), I decided to keep it around: it is nicely symmetric
> with linitial(), and it makes any code that actually needs the last
> value in a list significantly more readable.
Tom Lane wrote:
I thought llast() and length() were going away too?
For llast(), I decided to keep it around: it is nicely symmetric
with linitial(), and it makes any code that actually needs the last
value in a list significantly more readable. Since it's a macro
there's no runtime cost.
I had
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch updates the remaining parts of the source tree to use the
> new List API function names and disables the list compatibility API
> by default. This patch compiles without warnings and passes the
> regression tests.
I thought llast() and length
This patch updates the remaining parts of the source tree to use the
new List API function names and disables the list compatibility API
by default. This patch compiles without warnings and passes the
regression tests.
This patch does not remove the usage of FastList; that should also
be done.
