I have applied the following patch. It was submitted a while ago.:
For application to HEAD, following community review.
* Changes incorrect CYGWIN defines to __CYGWIN__
* Some localtime returns NULL checks (when unchecked cause SEGVs under
Win32
regression tests)
* Rationalized CreateSharedMem
This patch makes the "block on semaphore" interruptible by signals on
win32. Without this, you can't kill a backend when it's waiting on a
lock.
//Magnus
win32_semint.patch
Description: win32_semint.patch
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain an
> You do not patch configure. Ever. It's a derived file.
Thanks Tom, looks like I chopped the wrong configure file out of my patch.
Here's the right bit...
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers an
Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/configure,v
> retrieving revision 1.321
> diff -c -r1.321 configure
You do not patch configure. Ever. It's a derived file.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcas
For application to HEAD, pending community review (rand.c to go in src/port)
Briefly,
* configure + Makefile changes
* shared memory attaching in EXEC_BACKEND case (+ minor fix for apparent
cygwin bug under cygwin/EXEC_BACKEND case only)
* PATH env var separator differences
* missing win32 ra
Patch applied. Thanks.
(No, no one calls SendPostmasterSignal that doesn't have the postmaster
as a parent.)
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> For application to HEAD, pending community review.
>
> Briefly,
>
> [all] Remove
This time with a patch actually attached [doh!]
> -Original Message-
> From: Claudio Natoli
> Sent: Monday, 12 January 2004 6:45 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: win32 patch: processCancelRequest/reaper (+ various minor
> changes)
>
>
>
> For application to HEAD, pending commun
For application to HEAD, pending community review.
Briefly,
[all] Removed call to getppid in SendPostmasterSignal, replacing with a
PostmasterPid variable, which gets set (early) in PostmasterMain
- Q: Is this ok? Specifically, does anything call this function where
getppid would not be the po
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> If this is acceptable, I'll send a similar one for src/backend/Makefile
>
> Cheers,
> Claudio
>
>
> ---
> WE HAVE MOVED - PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW CONTACT DETAILS:
> TH
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
> > Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
>
> Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
> the WIN32_DEV branch...)
OK. You said you had some backend/Makefile stuff too. Please check CVS
head first because I dealt with ln -s an
> Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
the WIN32_DEV branch...)
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
http://www.m
Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> If this is acceptable, I'll send a similar one for src/backend/Makefile
>
> Cheers,
> Claudio
>
>
> ---
> WE HAVE MOVED - PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW C
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> If this is acc
If this is acceptable, I'll send a similar one for src/backend/Makefile
Cheers,
Claudio
---
WE HAVE MOVED - PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW CONTACT DETAILS:
THE BASEMENT, 33 EWELL STREET, BALMAIN NSW 2041
TEL: +61 2 9555 1544 FAX: +61 2 9555 6911
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent
14 matches
Mail list logo
