Re: [PATCHES] WIP XLog Switch

2005-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 18:38 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 23:16 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Any farther on this? > > > > No, but it will be in by deadline. > > > > I need to make first base with partitioning before I can do this. Hence > > my (othe

Re: [PATCHES] WIP XLog Switch

2005-07-19 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 18:38 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 23:16 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Any farther on this? > > No, but it will be in by deadline. > > I need to make first base with partitioning before I can do this. Hence > my (otherwise rude) ignoring of your sterli

Re: [PATCHES] WIP XLog Switch

2005-05-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 23:16 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Any farther on this? No, but it will be in by deadline. I need to make first base with partitioning before I can do this. Hence my (otherwise rude) ignoring of your sterling work on the exec logging patch. Best Regards, Simon Riggs

Re: [PATCHES] WIP XLog Switch

2005-05-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Any farther on this? --- Simon Riggs wrote: > > WIP patch to perform a switch from one log file to next when we do a > pg_stop_backup(), including wal replay handling at recovery time. > > Patch currently crashes server at

Re: [PATCHES] WIP XLog Switch

2005-04-20 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:44 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > Main issue is the need to poke the xlog record pointer with a new value > after the log switch. I'm a little uncertain about that approach and I'm > very likely getting it wrong now. Better ideas welcome. Happier with that approach now. Worki