Pavel Stehule wrote:
this patch allows optional using label with END and END LOOP. Ending label
has only informational value, but can enhance readability large block and
enhance likeness with Oracle.
Reviewed and applied -- thanks for the patch.
-Neil
---(end of broad
separate email;
- nothing done around cost estimation.
Waiting for feedback, thanks.
--
Victor Y. Yegorov
diff-20050702.gz
Description: Binary data
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
The following attached, applied patch adds E'' to internally created SQL
strings that contain backslashes. I also added two macros to improve
code clarity.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your l
Seems you have managed to combine inheritance, check constraints, and
partial index into table paritioning. It is nice it requires no new
syntax. Here is an example from your tests:
DROP TABLE pm cascade;
CREATE TABLE pm
( dkey INT NOT NULL
);
Is a new version of this patch coming?
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 6/29/2005 2:16 AM To: Dave
> > Page
We will need these:
> Patch includes only changes to backend, I will make pg_dump, ecpg and
> documentation patches once this is completed and accepted by team.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 July 2005 21:30
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
>
>
> Is a new version of this patch coming?
Yup, attach
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 04:28:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We will need these:
>
> > Patch includes only changes to backend, I will make pg_dump, ecpg and
> > documentation patches once this is completed and accepted by team.
>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patche
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:56:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > I enclose a fully working implementation of Constraint Exclusion, a very
> > basic form of Partitioning. Initial review is requested, to allow us all
> > to assess what further work is required on this pri
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:56:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I am surprised no one else has commented on it, which I think means your
>> code is ready for the queue. Do you want to adjust it based on this
>> feedback or should I apply and you can a
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 04:28:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > We will need these:
> >
> > > Patch includes only changes to backend, I will make pg_dump, ecpg and
> > > documentation patches once this is completed and accepted by team.
> >
> > Your patch has been ad
Tom Lane wrote:
> AgentM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Attached is a patch which corrects the behavior. I verified that the
> > patch does not interfere with normal operation (using psql) but
> > unfortunately the code path is virtually impossible to test without a
> > really slow connectio
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2005 21:30
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
Is a new version of this patch coming?
Yup,
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:28:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >
> > >All the logs for the most recent run against HEAD are now at
> >
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: 02 July 2005 21:30
> >>To: Bruce Momjian
> >>Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
> >>Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integr
* Petr Jelinek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> + if (!(superuser()
> + || ((Form_pg_database) GETSTRUCT(tuple))->datdba ==
> GetUserId()))
> + aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_DATABASE,
> +stmt->dbname);
This should almos
This patch allows contrib/pgcrypto to build with OpenSSL 0.9.8
(currently in beta) when cryptolib = openssl. According to the
following checkin message from several years ago, OpenSSL application
developers should no longer rely on to include
everything they need:
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> This patch allows contrib/pgcrypto to build with OpenSSL 0.9.8
> (currently in beta) when cryptolib = openssl. According to the
> following checkin message from several yea
On Jul 3, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Yup, attached. Per our earlier conversation, pg_dbfile_size() now
returns the size of a table or index, and pg_relation_size()
returns the
total size of a relation and all associated indexes and toast
Karel Zak wrote:
>
> This is new version of SELECT FOR UPDATE NOWAIT patch.
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 08:40 +0200, Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> > yes, i think we can do it in time.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> >hans
> >
> >
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
>
The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.| Newtow
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is a first patch to allow these commands.
> >
> > > ALTER TABLE ENABLE TRIGGER
> > > ALTER TABLE DISABLE TRIGGER
> >
>
> Hmmm.. just thinking about it for a second. I wonder if we should also
> suppor
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom, if you're watching, are you working on this? I can probably spend
> > some time today on it, if that'd be helpful.
>
> I am not; I was hoping you'd deal with SET ROLE. Is it really much
> different from SE
Bruce Momjian writes:
> The following patch disables WAL backup pages when fsync is off.
This is a good idea why?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister comma
24 matches
Mail list logo
