Harald Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know how to access the affected values for
> statement-level triggers? I mean what the "old" and "new"
> pseudo-records are for row-level triggers.
Yeah, I didn't get around to implementing that. If anyone wants this
feature, I'd encourage th
"scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, previously run query should be faster, if it fits in kernel
> cache.
Or the PostgreSQL buffer cache.
> Plus, the design of Postgresql is such that it would have to do a
> LOT of cache checking to see if there were any updates to the
> underlying
