Re: [PERFORM] [Solved] Postgres performance problem

2007-08-30 Thread Richard Huxton
Decibel! wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Ruben Rubio wrote: As you may know, I do a vacuum full and a reindex database each day. I have logs that confirm that its done and I can check that everything was fine. So, this morning, I stopped the website, I stopped database, starte

Re: [PERFORM] [Solved] Postgres performance problem

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Lewis
Perhaps you had a long-running transaction open (probably a buggy or hung application) that was preventing dead rows from being cleaned up. Restarting PG closed the offending connection and rolled back the transaction, which allowed vacuum to clean up all the dead rows. If you're not running regul

Re: [PERFORM] [Solved] Postgres performance problem

2007-08-30 Thread Decibel!
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Ruben Rubio wrote: > As you may know, I do a vacuum full and a reindex database each day. I > have logs that confirm that its done and I can check that everything was > fine. > > So, this morning, I stopped the website, I stopped database, started it > ag

Re: [PERFORM] [Solved] Postgres performance problem

2007-08-30 Thread Ruben Rubio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ... Seems its solved. But the problem is not found. As you may know, I do a vacuum full and a reindex database each day. I have logs that confirm that its done and I can check that everything was fine. So, this morning, I stopped the website,

Re: [PERFORM] Postgres performance problem

2007-08-30 Thread ruben
Bill Moran escribió: > In response to Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Hi, >>> >>> Note: I have already vacumm full. It does not solve the problem. > > To jump in here in Chris' defense, regular vacuum is not at all the same > as vacuum full. Periodic vacuum is _much_ preferable to an occas