I'll be glad to test the patches using pgbench on my POWER4 box
running AIX 5.3 and an IA64 that runs HP-UX 11.31.
Derek
On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Database performance geeks,
We have a number of patches pending for 8.4 designed to improve
databas
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark Mielke wrote:
>> Greg Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Bruce Momjian wrote:
'data=writeback' is the recommended mount method for that file
system, though I see that is not mentioned in our official
documentation.
>>> While writeback has good perform
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a pair of 8 core opteron 16 drive machines I would like to
test it on. If nothing else I'll just take queries from the log to
run against an 8.4 install. It'll have to be late at night though...
> If you are going
Josh,
Since a number of these performance patches use our hash function, would
it make sense to apply the last patch to upgrade the hash function mix()
to the two function mix()/final()? Since the additional changes increases
the performance of the hash function by another 50% or so. My two cents.
Database performance geeks,
We have a number of patches pending for 8.4 designed to improve database
performance in a variety of circumstances. We need as many users as possible
to build test versions of PostgreSQL with these patches, and test how well
they perform, and report back in some det
