On 22-2-2010 6:39 Greg Smith wrote:
But the point of this whole testing exercise coming back into vogue
again is that SSDs have returned this negligent behavior to the
mainstream again. See
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=121424 for a discussion
of this in a ZFS context just last
Ron Mayer wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Agreed, thought I thought the problem was that SSDs lie about their
cache flush like SATA drives do, or is there something I am missing?
There's exactly one case I can find[1] where this century's IDE
drives lied more than any other drive with a ca
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Rose Zhou wrote:
> We bought a new WinXP x64 Professional, it has 12GB memory.
>
> I installed postgresql-8.4.1-1-windows version on this PC, also installed
> another .Net application which reads in data from a TCP port and
> insert/update the database, the data vo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Agreed, thought I thought the problem was that SSDs lie about their
> cache flush like SATA drives do, or is there something I am missing?
There's exactly one case I can find[1] where this century's IDE
drives lied more than any other drive with a cache:
Under 120GB Maxto
Scott Carey wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Dan Langille wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Greg Smith wrote:
> > In order for a drive to work r
On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Matthew Wakeling wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Greg Smith wrote:
> In order for a drive to work reliably for database use such as for
