introduce bugs. If we can get to the point where we have something to
play around with, even if it's kind of kludgey or doesn't quite work,
it'll give us some idea of whether further effort is worthwhile and
how it should be directed.
Should I put this on the TODO list, then, in hopes that s
t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
>> http://explain.depesz.com/s/br9
>> http://explain.depesz.com/s/gxH
> Well, I don't have time to do a thorough analysis right now, but in all
> the plans you've posted there are quite high values in the "Rows x" column
> (e.g. the 5727.5 value).
> That means a significant
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:45:23PM +0200, Yeb Havinga wrote:
Due to the LBA remapping of the SSD, I'm not sure of putting files
that are sequentially written in a different partition (together with
e.g. tables) would make a difference: in the end the SSD will have a
set new blocks in it's buffe
> http://explain.depesz.com/s/br9
> http://explain.depesz.com/s/gxH
Well, I don't have time to do a thorough analysis right now, but in all
the plans you've posted there are quite high values in the "Rows x" column
(e.g. the 5727.5 value).
That means a significant difference in estimated and actu
Hi,
Hrm ... are you *certain* that's an 8.4 server?
Yep.
# psql -U postgres -d db
psql (8.4.4)
db=# select version();
version
--
