On Oct 16, 2014 12:58 AM, "Tom Lane" wrote:
>
> Igor Neyman writes:
> > From: Dave Johansen [mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com]
> > This conversation has probably become a bit off topic, but my
understanding is that what you're paying RedHat for is a stable platform
for a long period of time. That me
On 15 November 2014 06:00, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> It is probably time to revisit this 8GB limit with some benchmarking. We
> don't really have a hard and fast rule that is known to be correct, and that
> makes Alexey's job really difficult. Informally folk (including myself at
> times) have sugge
On 15 November 2014 02:10, Alexey Vasiliev wrote:
> Ok. Just need to know what think another developers about this - should
> pgtune care about this case? Because I am not sure, what users with 512GB
> will use pgtune.
pgtune should certainly care about working with large amounts of RAM.
Best
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 01:19 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > Sorry I don't understand what you mean by that. My understanding is that
> > RedHat maintains fixes for security and other major issues for packages
> > that have been EOLed. Are you implying th
Yuri Kunde Schlesner writes:
> Does anyone know if there's any tweaking I can do in Postgres so that it
> uses the appropriate plan?
I suspect that the reason the planner likes the backlog_pkey is that it's
almost perfectly correlated with table order, which greatly reduces the
number of table fe
