and...@anarazel.de (Andres Freund) writes:
> On 2015-07-08 15:38:24 -0700, Craig James wrote:
>> From my admittedly naive point of view, it's hard to see why any of this
>> matters. I have functions that do purely CPU-intensive mathematical
>> calculations ... you could imagine something like is_pr
On 2015-07-08 15:38:24 -0700, Craig James wrote:
> From my admittedly naive point of view, it's hard to see why any of this
> matters. I have functions that do purely CPU-intensive mathematical
> calculations ... you could imagine something like is_prime(N) that
> determines if N is a prime number.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-07-08 13:46:53 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake >
> > >> Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
>
On 2015-07-08 13:46:53 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> >> Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each instance
> >> of the function being executed and that in turn will us
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Craig James wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
>>> that put some chemistry calculations int
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
> I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
>>
>> Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
>> instance of the function being executed and that in t
On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:
I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
instance of the function being executed and that in turn will use
all CPUs up to the max available resource.
With P
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake
wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
>> that put some chemistry calculations into Postgres as extensions (things
>> like, "calculate the molecular
On 2015-07-08 11:13:04 +, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
> I'm guessing you are maybe pressed for time at the moment because I
> already clearly included this on the last email, as well as the links
> to the alternative benchmarks with the same problem I referred to on
> both of my last emails which are
On 07 Jul 2015, at 22:52, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
>>
>> Hi Merlin,
>>
>> Long story short - thanks for the reply, but you're not measuring anything
>> about the parallelism of code running in a pl/pgsql environment here. You're
>> just me
> On 07/07/2015 08:05 PM, Craig James wrote:
>>
>>
>> No ideas, but I ran into the same thing. I have a set of C/C++ functions
>> that put some chemistry calculations into Postgres as extensions (things
>> like, "calculate the molecular weight of this molecule"). As SQL
>> functions, the whole th
Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Mike Broers
> Sent: Dienstag, 7. Juli 2015 18:28
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] wildcard text filter switched to boole
12 matches
Mail list logo
