Re: [PERFORM] Hardware upgrade for a high-traffic database

2004-08-11 Thread Brian Hirt
On Aug 11, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Jason Coene wrote: I'm wondering why our PG server is using so little memory... The system has 2GB of memory, though only around 200MB of it are used. Is there a PG setting to force more memory usage towards the cache? Additionally, we use FreeBSD. I've heard

Re: [PERFORM] my boss want to migrate to ORACLE

2004-07-30 Thread Brian Hirt
pg_autovacuum is a daemon, not something that get's run twice a day. I think that's what the question Matthew was getting @. I'm not sure what would happen to performance if pg_autovacuum was launched twice a day from cron, but you could end up in an ugly situation if it starts up. --brian

[PERFORM] hardware raid suggestions

2004-07-15 Thread Brian Hirt
I've been using the adaptec ZCR raid cards in our servers for a while now, mostly small systems with 3 or 6 disks, and we've been very happy with them. However, we're building a new DB machine with 14 U320 15K SCA drives, and we've run into a performance bottlenkeck with the ZCR card where

Re: [PERFORM] Inconsistent performance

2003-09-15 Thread Brian Hirt
it seems like the difference is probably related to caching. you say you have 1gb of ram, and the database is 2gb.Obviously the entire database isn't cached, but maybe your query runs fast when the table is in memory, and they it gets swapped out of cache because some other piece of