On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:49:14 +, wrote:
For an academic experiment I need to *restrict the total amount of memory
that is available for a pgSQL server* to compute a given set of queries.
I know that I can do this through postgressql.conffile, where I can adjust
Hi Mariel,
On 9/7/2017 7:02 AM, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the source tables are changing during the loop. I
have no problem showing the query :
SELECT AREA,
PHONE,
TERM_CODE,
LINE_NO,
PAYMENT_START_DATE,
Hi Mariel,
On 9/6/2017 4:38 AM, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
I'm sure that those tables arent involved in any other transaction
when the loop is running. Anything else that I can check ? I think
that mybe its connected to some fetching properties but Im not
familiar with what settings..
That's
Geez ... I just saw how my last message got mangled.
Trying again.
On 9/5/2017 7:28 AM, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
I didn't understand what do you mean by REPEATABLE_READ.
I was referring to transaction isolation levels. When multiple
transactions are running concurrently, the DBMS can (or
Hi Mariel,
Please don't top post in the Postgresql groups.
On 9/5/2017 7:28 AM, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
2017-08-31 16:24 GMT+03:00 George Neuner <gneun...@comcast.net > <mailto:gneun...@comcast.net>>: > >> One thing you might look at is
the isolation level of the qu
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:15:19 +0300, Mariel Cherkassky
wrote:
>I'm trying to understand what postgresql doing in an issue that I'm
having.
>Our app team wrote a function that runs with a cursor over the results
of a
>query and via the utl_file func they write
On 8/10/2017 1:29 AM, l...@laurent-hasson.com wrote:
Finally, my true question was whether Postgres would support something
like worm with the performance benefits of UNLOGGED, but not the
inconveniences of auto truncates.
If you can live with the limitations, one other thing you might
On 8/10/2017 1:29 AM, l...@laurent-hasson.com wrote:
Hello George... I know about not doing top posting but was emailing
from my phone, and just recently moved to Android. I think I am still
not configured right.
Somewhat orthogonal, but any particular reason why top posts == bad,
or just
Please don't top post.
On 8/9/2017 2:30 PM, l...@laurent-hasson.com wrote:
> On 8/9/2017 2:17 PM, gneun...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:14:48 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Why doesn't the Windows scheduled shutdown signal postgres to shutdown
>> cleanly and
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:14:48 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
>Why doesn't the Windows scheduled shutdown signal postgres to shutdown
>cleanly and wait for it to do so? That is what is supposed to happen.
Windows *does* signal shutdown (and sleep and hibernate and wakeup).
testing
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Hi,
I am using Postgresql 9.3.5 on Ubuntu and I have a sudden, unexplained
failure in a function that has been working for a long time.
--- code
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION gen_random()
RETURNS double precision AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
num float8 := 0;
den
13 matches
Mail list logo