Re: [PERFORM] configure shmmax on MAC OS X

2004-04-13 Thread Jeff Bohmer
--- >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink, Inc. _ 303.402

Re: [PERFORM] Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server

2003-12-15 Thread Jeff Bohmer
3-10/msg01343.php This post indicates that SATA drives still have problems, but a new ATA standard might fix things in the future: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2003-10/msg01395.php SATA RAID is a good option for a testing server, though. - Jeff -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink, Inc.

Re: [PERFORM] Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server

2003-12-13 Thread Jeff Bohmer
looking at 32- vs. 64-bit just for memory reasons and not 64-bit apps. - Jeff -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink, Inc. _ 303.402.0170 www.visionlink.org _ People. Tools. Change. Community. ---(end of broadcast

Re: [PERFORM] Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server

2003-12-13 Thread Jeff Bohmer
We'll probably get battery-backed write cache and start out with a 4 disk RAID 10 array. Then add more disks and change RAID 5 if more read performance is needed. Thanks, - Jeff -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink, Inc. _ 303.402.0170 www.visi

Re: [PERFORM] Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server

2003-12-11 Thread Jeff Bohmer
e'd factor in the penalty from PAE for now and have the performance boost from moving to 64bit available on demand. Not having to build another DB server in a year would also be nice. FYI, we need stability first and performance second. Thank you, - Jeff -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink, Inc. __

[PERFORM] Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server

2003-12-11 Thread Jeff Bohmer
e the entire database. While 64bit is in our long-term future, we're willing to stick with 32bit Linux until 64bit Linux on Itanium/Opteron and 64bit PostgreSQL "settle in" to proven production-quality. TIA, - Jeff -- Jeff Bohmer VisionLink,