On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Ron Arts ron.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 30-01-12 02:52, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa schreef:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ron Arts ron.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I am running PostgreSQL 8.1 (CentOS 5.7) on a VM on a single XCP
(Xenserver) host
Greetings,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Jayashankar K B
jayashankar...@lnties.com wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the source code and cross compiled it into a relocatable package
and copied it to the device.
LTIB was the cross-compile tool chain that was used. Controller is coldfire
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ron Arts ron.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I am running PostgreSQL 8.1 (CentOS 5.7) on a VM on a single XCP (Xenserver)
host.
This is a HP server with 8GB, Dual Quad Core, and 2 SATA in RAID-1.
The problem is: it's running very slow compared to running it
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Andrzej Nakonieczny
dzemik-pgsql-performa...@e-list.pingwin.eu.org wrote:
W dniu 20.07.2011 17:57, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa pisze:
[...]
Many of the advantages of partitioning have to do with maintenance
tasks. For example, if you gather data
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
ildefonso.cama...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the question is, if I were to store 8TB worth of data into large
objects system, it would actually make
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 15:34 +0200, vincent dephily wrote:
Hi,
I have a delete query taking 7.2G of ram (and counting) but I do not
understant why so much memory is necessary. The server has 12G, and
I'm afraid
Hi!
Thanks (you both, Samuel and Craig) for your answers!
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Craig James
craig_ja...@emolecules.com wrote:
On 6/19/11 4:37 AM, Samuel Gendler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
ildefonso.cama...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings
Greetings,
I have been thinking a lot about pgsql performance when it is dealing
with tables with lots of rows on one table (several millions, maybe
thousands of millions). Say, the Large Object use case:
one table has large objects (have a pointer to one object).
The large object table stores
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
Yeb Havinga wrote:
model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor @ 3.00GHz
cpu cores : 4
stream compiled with -O3
Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Yeb Havinga wrote:
The rather wierd dip at 5 threads is consistent over multiple tries
I've seen that twice on 4 core systems now. The spot where there's just one
more thread than cores seems to be the worst case
Hi!
Thanks you all for this great amount of information!
What memory/motherboard (ie, chipset) is installed on the phenom ii one?
it looks like it peaks to ~6.2GB/s with 4 threads.
Also, what kernel is on it? (uname -a would be nice).
Now, this looks like sustained memory speed, what about
Hi!
Thanks for the review link!
Ildefonso.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
This isn't an older Opteron, its 6 core, 6MB L3 cache Istanbul. Its not
the newer stuff either.
Everything before Magny Cours is now an
12 matches
Mail list logo
