Re: [PERFORM] How long should it take to insert 200,000 records?

2007-02-14 Thread Lou O';Quin
unless you specify otherwiise, every insert carries its own transaction begin/commit. That's a lot of overhead for a single insert, no? Why not use a single transaction for, say, each 1000 inserts? That would strike a nice balance of security with efficiency. pseudo code for the insert: Begin

Re: [PERFORM] Query performance

2005-03-11 Thread Lou O';Quin
local network client  is a WinXP Pro, P4, 2.2 gHzthe remote network client is WinXP Pro, P4, 1.9 gHz   Lou >>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/11/2005 1:21 PM >>> "Lou O'Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Hi Tom.  I referenced the status line of pgAdmin.  Per

Re: [PERFORM] Query performance

2005-03-11 Thread Lou O';Quin
er to the Data Output page."   Lou>>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/11/2005 12:10 PM >>> "Lou O'Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> it appears to actually be hypersensitive to the transport delay. The => ratios of time for the data transpo

[PERFORM] Query performance

2005-03-11 Thread Lou O';Quin
As a test, I ran a query in the pgAdmin query tool, which returns about 15K records from a PostgreSQL v8.01 table on my Win2K server.I ran the same query from the local server, from another PC on the same 100 mbit local network, and from a PC on a different network, over the internet. The times fo