On 09/28/2012 09:57 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 9/28/2012 9:46 AM, Craig James wrote:
Your best warranty would be to have the confidence to do your own
repairs, and to have the parts on hand. I'd seriously consider
putting your own system together. Maybe go to a few sites with
pre-configured m
On 09/27/2012 02:55 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM, M. D. wrote:
select item.item_id,item_plu.number,item.description,
(select number from account where asset_acct = account_id),
(select number from account where expense_acct = account_id),
(select number from account
On 09/27/2012 01:37 PM, Craig James wrote:
I don't think you've supplied enough information for anyone to give
you a meaningful answer. What's your current configuration? Are you
I/O bound, CPU bound, memory limited, or some other problem? You need
to do a specific analysis of the queries that
On 09/27/2012 01:47 PM, David Boreham wrote:
On 9/27/2012 1:37 PM, Craig James wrote:
We use a "white box" vendor (ASA Computers), and have been very happy
with the results. They build exactly what I ask for and deliver it in
about a week. They offer on-site service and warranties, but don't
p
On 09/27/2012 01:22 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:11 PM, M. D. wrote:
At this point I'm dealing with a fairly small database of 8 to 9 GB.
...
The on_hand lookup table
currently has 3 million rows after 4 years of data.
...
For both servers I'd have at leas
Hi everyone,
I want to buy a new server, and am contemplating a Dell R710 or the
newer R720. The R710 has the x5600 series CPU, while the R720 has the
newer E5-2600 series CPU.
At this point I'm dealing with a fairly small database of 8 to 9 GB.
The server will be dedicated to Postgres and
it and
return 0 for both columns on that customer_id as it should always be
0.
On 09/24/2011 12:10 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski wrote:
2011/9/23 M. D. <li...@turnkey.bz>
I did a software upgrade, and with it came a new feature where
Hi everyone,
I did a software upgrade, and with it came a new feature where when
selecting a customer it queries for the sum of a few columns. This
takes 7 seconds for the 'Cash Sale' customer - by far the most active
customer. I'd like to see if it's possible to get it down a bit by
changin
On 07/18/2011 03:56 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Dne 18.7.2011 22:11,k...@rice.edu napsal(a):
In my testing I have a 32bit CentOS on the x3450, but a 64bit CentOS
on the E5335. Can this make such a bit difference or should the
perform fairly close to the same speed? Both servers have 8GB of
RAM, a
I have 2 small servers, one a fairly new server with a x3450 (4-core
with HT) cpu running at 2.67GHz and an older E5335 (4-core) cpu running
at 2GHz.
I have been quite surprised how the E5335 compares very closely to the
x3450, but maybe I have tested it wrongly.
here's the CPUINFO:
processo
10 matches
Mail list logo
