Hi Jim, Thanks for your response. Yes the tables have been analysed and I have also re-indexed and vacuumed the slave database. Regards Matthew
Sent from my iPad > On 14 Dec 2015, at 17:49, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: > >> On 12/14/15 11:16 AM, Matthew Lunnon wrote: >> Inspecting the execution plan shows that there are some differences, for >> example, the slave is using a HashAggregate when the master is simply >> grouping. There also seems to be a difference with the ordering of the >> sub plans. > > Have you tried analyzing the tables on the slave? > > Also, keep in mind that the first time you access rows on a Slony slave after > they're replicated Postgres will need to write hint bits out, which will take > some time. But that's clearly not the issue here. > -- > Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX > Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL > Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
