Re: [PERFORM] Table Partitions / Partial Indexes

2005-12-13 Thread Mike C
On 12/14/05, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe not for queries, but if you use a date range then you never needto run a DELETE and never need to VACUUM.You could split the data into two-day chunks. That's an interesting idea, thanks. Am I using a horrid method for partitioning the data?

[PERFORM] Table Partitions / Partial Indexes

2005-12-11 Thread Mike C
filesystem? Any advice on table splitting much appreciated. Cheers,Mike C.

Re: [PERFORM] Table Partitions / Partial Indexes

2005-12-11 Thread Mike C
On 12/12/05, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike C [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: CLUSTER on PC_TRAFFIC_IDX3 gives me significantly improved performance:How can you tell?Neither of these are EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. regards, tom lane Sorry that's a result of my bad record keeping. I've been keeping

Re: [PERFORM] Slow UPADTE, compared to INSERT

2003-12-05 Thread Mike C. Fletcher
? ___ Mike C. Fletcher Designer, VR Plumber, Coder http://members.rogers.com/mcfletch/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PERFORM] Slow UPADTE, compared to INSERT

2003-12-05 Thread Mike C. Fletcher
): return %s::int8%(self.value,) Enjoy, Mike ___ Mike C. Fletcher Designer, VR Plumber, Coder http://members.rogers.com/mcfletch/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map