Amjad
On 9/19/06, Milen
Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello
Lister,I am curios whether I can emulate the Oracle pipelined functions
functionality in PG too (using RETURN NEXT ). For more information and
examples about Oracle pipelined functi
int); Hope this
helps...Thanks,-- Shoaib MirEnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
On 9/20/06, Milen
Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello
Lister,I am curios whether I can emulate the Oracle pipelined functions
functionality in PG too (using RETURN NEXT ). For moreinform
Hello Lister,
I am curios whether I can emulate the Oracle pipelined functions functionality
in PG too (using RETURN NEXT ). For more
information and examples about Oracle pipelined functions see:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:8127757633768425921::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRI
And sorry for the hassle.
I was running the db cluster with Tthw wrong(old) postgresql.conf ;(
Best Regrads.
Milen
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 1:14 AM
To: Milen Kulev
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
constraint_exclusion
; constraint_exclusion-- on(1
row)
Best Regards.
Milen
-Original Message-From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday,
September 18, 2006 1:14 AMTo: Milen KulevCc:
pgsql-performance@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [PERFORM] Partition elimination
Title: Nachricht
Hi listers,I wanted to try PG partitioning (aka constraint
exclusion) with two levels .I am using PG 8.1.3 on
RHEL4U2,My setup:CREATE TABLE part (
id1 int not null, id2
int not null, id3 int not
null, filler varchar(200)
);--- level 1 partitions
gust 03, 2006 7:36 AMTo: Luke
LonerganCc: Milen Kulev;
pgsql-performance@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [PERFORM] XFS
filessystem for Datawarehousing -2I was kinda
thinking that making the Block Size configurable at InitDB time would be a
nice & simple enhancement for PG 8.3. My own
Hi Luke,
That is ~ 50% increase !! Amazing...
How many reader processes did you have to get this results ?
Regards. Milen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Lonergan
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:05 AM
To: Michael Stone; pgsql-perfo
our any FS over another .
Best
Regards.
MIlen
Kulev
-Original Message-From: Steve Poe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:27
PMTo: Milen KulevCc:
pgsql-performance@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [PERFORM] XFS
filessystem for DatawarehousingMilen,
outpertform ETX3 (no default setups
for both are planned !). I am not sure
whether is it worth to include JFS in comparison too ...
Best Regards,
Milen Kulev
-Original Message-
From: Luke Lonergan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 4:43 AM
To: Milen Kulev; pgsql
it should be a a good idea to use as much contigious chunks of space
(from OS point of view) as possible in
order to make full table scans as fast as possible.
Best Regards,
Milen Kulev
-Original Message-
From: J. Andrew Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02
Sorry, forgot to ask:
What is the recommended/best PG block size for DWH database? 16k, 32k, 64k ?
What hsould be the relation between XFS/RAID stripe size and PG block size ?
Best Regards.
Milen Kulev
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
) should I configure
5) Is it wortj settion noatime ?
6) What I/O scheduler(elevators) should I use (massive sequencial reads)
7) What is the ideal stripe unit and width (for a RAID device) ?
I will appreciate any options, suggestions, pointers.
Best Regards.
Milen Kulev
According to
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/raid/concepts/perfStripe-c.html, it seems
to be the other way around?
("As stripe size is decreased, files are broken into smaller and smaller
pieces. This increases the number of drives
that an average file will use to hold all the blocks contain
Reading a PDF document on Bizgres site).
Thanks ahain for the information.
Regards. Milen
-Original Message-
From: Luke Lonergan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:28 PM
To: Milen Kulev
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; bizgres-general
Subject: Re: [PERFORM
Hi Luke,
I (still) haven't tried Bizgres, but what do you mean with "The current
drawback to bitmap index is that it isn't very
maintainable under insert/update, although it is safe for those operations"?
Do you mean that INSERT/UPDATE operations against bitmap indexes are
imperformant ?
If ye
16 matches
Mail list logo