>
> Among other things (FreeBSD advocacy, mostly :) ), it contains a direct
> comparison between MySQL and PostgreSQL on various platforms, with
> PostgreSQL winning!
>
Hello,
If the queries are complex, this is understable. I had a performance
review of a Hibernate project (Java Object Relati
Mark Kirkwood schrieb:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Sebastian,
>>
>>> Before inventing a hyper tool, we might consider to provide 3-5 example
>>> szenarios for common hardware configurations. This consumes less time
>>> and be discussed and defined in a couple of days. This is of course not
>>> the corr
Josh Berkus schrieb:
> Sebastian,
>
>
>> Before inventing a hyper tool, we might consider to provide 3-5 example
>> szenarios for common hardware configurations. This consumes less time
>> and be discussed and defined in a couple of days. This is of course not
>> the correct option for a brandn
time
and be discussed and defined in a couple of days. This is of course not
the correct option for a brandnew 20 spindle Sata 10.000 Raid 10 system
but these are probably not the target for default configurations.
If we carefully document these szenario they would we a great help for
people hav
You could issue one query containing a
select uuid FROM MDM.KEYWORDS_INFO WHERE KEYWORDS_ID in (xy)
where xy is a large comma separated list of your values.
Best Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-
http://www.laliluna.de
* Tutorials for JSP, JavaServer Faces, Struts, Hibernate
e is going to cause much pain when inserting values
>and I'm not entirely sure if I see why normalising it should cause a
>massive performance improvement.
>
>
>
Just an idea: When you do not want to adapt your application to use a
normalized database you may push the da
Sebastian Hennebrueder schrieb:
>Tino Wildenhain schrieb:
>
>
>
>
>>You can download the wikipedia content. Just browse the wikimedia site.
>>Its some work to change the data to be able to import into postgres,
>>but at least you have a lot real world data -
Tino Wildenhain schrieb:
> Sebastian Hennebrueder schrieb:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to test the performance of my Java/PostgreSQL applications
>> especially when making full text searches.
>> For this I am looking for a database with 50 to 300 MB having
ever else.
Does anybody have an idea where I can find a database like this or does
even have something like this?
--
Best Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
http://www.laliluna.de
Tutorials for JSP, JavaServer Faces, Struts, Hibernate and EJB
Get support, education and
actually. When the backup server is to slow, it may be not important which
mirroring tool you use.
--
Best Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
http://www.laliluna.de
Tutorials for JSP, JavaServer Faces, Struts, Hibernate and EJB
Get support, education and consulting
id+1)
>ORDER BY t1.id LIMIT 1;
>
> I created a test table which has 90k randomly inserted rows. And this is
> what EXPLAIN ANALYZE says:
>
>
As Cosimo stated the result can be wrong. The result is always wrong
when the id with value 1 does not exist.
--
Best Regard
unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Kind Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-
http://www.laliluna.de/tutorials.html
Tutorials for Java, Struts, JavaServer Faces, JSP, Hibernate, EJB and more.
---(end of broadcast)-
I found a solution to improve my query. I do not know why but the
statistics for all column has been 0.
I changed this to 10 for index columns and to 20 for all foreign key
columns.
and to 100 for foreign key columns.
I set the random page cost to 2
and now the query runs as expected.
Many thank
Hello,
I could not find any recommandations for the level of set statistics and
what a specific level does actually mean.
What is the difference between 1, 50 and 100? What is recommanded for a
table or column?
--
Kind Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-
http://www.laliluna.de
Solution not found as I thought. I integrated the query in a view and
the query plan became very bad once again.
The reason is that when I am using the view I have the joins in a
differerent order.
Does anyone have an idea to solve this.
Sebastian
a) bad order but the one I have in my applicatio
_id
) patchdaten ON taufgaben.fid = patchdaten.faufgaben_id
What I want to achieve is one column in my query beeing null or not null
and indicating if there is a patch which includes the aufgabe (engl.: task)
Is there a better way?
--
Kind Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-
h
g PostgreSQL 8.0 on Windows
Thank you for any idea
--
Kind Regards / Viele Grüße
Sebastian Hennebrueder
-
http://www.laliluna.de/tutorials.html
Tutorials for Java, Struts, JavaServer Faces, JSP, Hibernate, EJB and more.
enabled seqscan and nested_loop
explain analyze
SELECT taufgaben.fid
17 matches
Mail list logo