he maximum. For things like
> heap storage or swap it's awful as you can get hot spots that get written to
> thousands of times before the rest of the space is used.
I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that most of the newer
flash disks tended to spread writes out over the
irly
> cheap compared to ongoing maintenance of the 30+ drive system required
> to get decent throughput.
The current file system holding the user and email information indicates
the current data has about 64GB (70K accounts, I'm not sure how many are
active but 50% might be good gues
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 16:29, Neil Conway wrote:
> Suchandra Thapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was thinking using about using a raid 1+0 array to hold the
> > database but since I can use different array types, would it be
> > better to use 1+0 for the wal logs an
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:23, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:34, Suchandra Thapa wrote:
> > I'm moving a webmail service over to use a postgresql database for
> > storage and wanted to get any tips for optimizing performance. The
> > machine will be a mul
in in regards to the system's layout as well as how the
applications will interact with the database since I'm writing the
code.
--
Suchandra Thapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
