Anyway, one test of your theory that I can run immediately is to run the exact
> same workload on a bigger, faster server and see if the desired quantity of
> shared_buffers is roughly the same. I'm hoping that you're wrong -- not
> because I don't find your argument persua
privileged or confidential material intended for the named
> > recipient only.
> > If you are not the named recipient, delete this message and all attachments.
> > Unauthorized reviewing, copying, printing, disclosing, or otherwise using
> > information in this e-mail is prohibited.
> > We reserve the right to monitor e-mail
