Grega,
Well, as I said, that's why I was asking - I'm willing to give it a go
if nobody can prove me wrong. :)
Why not? If you have time?
I thought you knew - OCFS, OCFS-Tools and OCFSv2 have not only been open-
source for quite a while now - they're released under the GPL.
Keen!
...and on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:26:02AM -0400, Tom Lane used the keyboard:
After that, we get to implement our own filesystem-equivalent management
of disk space allocation, disk I/O scheduling, etc. Are we really
smarter than all those kernel hackers doing this for a living? I doubt it.
Grega,
Furthermore, this filesystem would be a blazing one stop solution for
all replication issues PostgreSQL currently suffers from, as its main
design goal was to present a consistent file system image across the
servers in a cluster.
Does it work, though? Without Oracle admin tools?
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:09:16AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
If your intention in this test is to show the superiority of raw devices, let
me give you a reality check: barring some major corporate backing getting
involved, we can't possibly implement our own PG-FS for database support. We
