Gregory Stark wrote:
TPC-E has more stringent requirements which explicitly require very consistent
response times and I doubt 8.2 would have been able to pass them.
Sure it would. Just not for a very large scale factor ;-).
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think TPC-E will make both of these major improvements much more important.
>> I suspect it would be hard to get 8.2 to even pass TPC-E due to the
>> checkpoint
>> dropouts.
>
> You'd be surprised, then. We're still horribly, horribly lock-bound on
(thread crossed over to pgsql-performance, where it belongs, from
pgsql-advocacy)
Greg,
I think TPC-E will make both of these major improvements much more important.
I suspect it would be hard to get 8.2 to even pass TPC-E due to the checkpoint
dropouts.
You'd be surprised, then. We're sti