Re: [PERFORM] [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

2008-04-28 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Gregory Stark wrote: TPC-E has more stringent requirements which explicitly require very consistent response times and I doubt 8.2 would have been able to pass them. Sure it would. Just not for a very large scale factor ;-). -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: [PERFORM] [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

2008-04-28 Thread Gregory Stark
"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think TPC-E will make both of these major improvements much more important. >> I suspect it would be hard to get 8.2 to even pass TPC-E due to the >> checkpoint >> dropouts. > > You'd be surprised, then. We're still horribly, horribly lock-bound on

Re: [PERFORM] [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL

2008-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
(thread crossed over to pgsql-performance, where it belongs, from pgsql-advocacy) Greg, I think TPC-E will make both of these major improvements much more important. I suspect it would be hard to get 8.2 to even pass TPC-E due to the checkpoint dropouts. You'd be surprised, then. We're sti