This was an intersting Win32/linux comparison. I expected
Linux to scale better, but I was surprised how poorly XP
scaled. It reinforces our perception that Win32 is for low
traffic servers.
That's a bit harsh given the lack of any further investigation so far
isn't it? Win32 can run
Merlin Moncure wrote:
This was an intersting Win32/linux comparison. I expected
Linux to scale better, but I was surprised how poorly XP
scaled. It reinforces our perception that Win32 is for low
traffic servers.
That's a bit harsh given the lack of any further investigation so
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
Ok, I am starting to strongly suspect the statistics collector of
various kinds of malfeasance.
OK, the big problem is that we are nearing RC1. We would like some
feedback on this as soon as possible. A major Win32 cleanup for
Merlin Moncure schrieb:
Following is the promised writeup in performance related issues
comparing win32 with linux x86 and linux x86-64. Unfortunately, the 64
bit portion of the test is not yet completed and won't be for a bit.
However there are some telling things about the win32/linux
Reini Urban wrote:
Merlin Moncure schrieb:
A good benchmark of our application performance is the time it takes
to
read the entire bill of materials for a product. This is a
recursive
read of about 2500 records in the typical case (2408 in the test
case).
I always knew that COBOL
This was an intersting Win32/linux comparison. I expected
Linux to
scale better, but I was surprised how poorly XP scaled. It
reinforces our perception that Win32 is for low traffic servers.
That's a bit harsh given the lack of any further
investigation so far
isn't it?
Is this for Postgresql Cygwin? You surely can't mean for all server
tasks - if so, I would say that's *way* off. There is a difference,
but
it's more along the line of single-digit percentage in my experience -
provided you config your machines reasonably, of course.
(In my experience,
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 15:06
To: Dave Page
Cc: Merlin Moncure; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
PostgreSQL Win32 port list
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32
The
This was an intersting Win32/linux comparison. I expected Linux to scale
better, but I was surprised how poorly XP scaled. It reinforces our
perception that Win32 is for low traffic servers.
---
Merlin Moncure wrote:
