On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 04:55 AM, CSS wrote:
>> I'm also curious about benchmarking using my own data. I tried something
>> long ago that at least gave the illusion of working, but didn't seem quite
>> right to me. I enabled basic query logging on one of
On 11/18/2011 04:55 AM, CSS wrote:
I'm also curious about benchmarking using my own data. I tried something long ago that
at least gave the illusion of working, but didn't seem quite right to me. I enabled
basic query logging on one of our busier servers, dumped the db, and let it run for 24
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:55 AM, CSS wrote:
> ps - considering the new PostgreSQL Performance book that Packt has, any
> strong feelings about that one way or the other? Does it go very far beyond
> what's on the wiki?
Since others have provided perfectly good answers to all your other
questi
2011/11/18 Tomas Vondra :
> On 18 Listopad 2011, 10:55, CSS wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm going to be testing some new hardware (see
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2011-11/msg00230.php) and
>> while I've done some very rudimentary before/after tests with pgbench, I'm
>> looking to
On 18 Listopad 2011, 10:55, CSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to be testing some new hardware (see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2011-11/msg00230.php) and
> while I've done some very rudimentary before/after tests with pgbench, I'm
> looking to pull more info than I have in the
Hello,
I'm going to be testing some new hardware (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2011-11/msg00230.php) and
while I've done some very rudimentary before/after tests with pgbench, I'm
looking to pull more info than I have in the past, and I'd really like to
automate things
