/ session / query?
Gregory
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:47 PM
To: Gregory Stewart
Cc: Mark Kirkwood; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
All the machines I&#x
> > > > > FWIW, I've found problems running PostgreSQL on Windows in a
> > > > > multi-CPU environment on w2k3. It runs fine for some
> period, and
> > > > > then CPU and throughput drop to zero. So far I've
> been unable to
> > > > > track down any more information than that, other than the
>
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:29:15AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > FWIW, I've found problems running PostgreSQL on Windows in a
> > > > multi-CPU environment on w2k3. It runs fine for some period, and
> > > > then CPU and throughput drop to zero. So far I've been unable to
> > > > track do
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:29 PM
> To: Mark Kirkwood
> Cc: Gregory Stewart; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
>
>
> On
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 03:29, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > FWIW, I've found problems running PostgreSQL on Windows in a
> > > > multi-CPU environment on w2k3. It runs fine for some period, and
> > > > then CPU and throughput drop to zero. So far I've been unable to
> > > > track down any more i
> > > FWIW, I've found problems running PostgreSQL on Windows in a
> > > multi-CPU environment on w2k3. It runs fine for some period, and
> > > then CPU and throughput drop to zero. So far I've been unable to
> > > track down any more information than that, other than the
> fact that
> > > I h
; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:59:56PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Pgadmin can give misleading times for queries that return large result
> sets over a network, due to:
>
> 1/ It takes time t
software I guess.
But I don't really know a whole lot about it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 7:04 PM
To: Gregory Stewart
Cc: Theodore Loscalzo
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
Gregory Stewart wr
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:49:48PM -0400, Jan de Visser wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:28, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:59:56PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > > Pgadmin can give misleading times for queries that return large result
> > > sets over a network, due to:
> > >
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:28, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:59:56PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > Pgadmin can give misleading times for queries that return large result
> > sets over a network, due to:
> >
> > 1/ It takes time to format the (large) result set for display.
> > 2
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:59:56PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Pgadmin can give misleading times for queries that return large result
> sets over a network, due to:
>
> 1/ It takes time to format the (large) result set for display.
> 2/ It has to count the time spent waiting for the (large) res
Gregory Stewart wrote:
Hello,
We are currently developing a web application and have the webserver and
PostgreSQL with our dev db running on a machine with these specs:
Win 2003 standard
AMD Athlon XP 3000 / 2.1 GHZ
2 Gig ram
120 gig SATA HD
PostgreSQL 8.1.0
Default pgsql configuration + shar
Hello,
We are currently developing a web application and have the webserver and
PostgreSQL with our dev db running on a machine with these specs:
Win 2003 standard
AMD Athlon XP 3000 / 2.1 GHZ
2 Gig ram
120 gig SATA HD
PostgreSQL 8.1.0
Default pgsql configuration + shared buffers = 30,000
The p
13 matches
Mail list logo
