Bucky,
On 9/15/06 11:28 AM, Bucky Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What other file systems have you had good success with? Solaris would be
nice, but it looks like I'm stuck running on FreeBSD (6.1, amd64) so
UFS2 would be the default. Not sure about XFS on BSD, and I'm not sure
at the moment
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.
Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.
Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?
No, they
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joshua D. Drake
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 12:01 AM
To: Luke Lonergan
Cc: Craig A. James; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Luke Lonergan wrote
When we first started working with Solaris ZFS, we were getting about
400-600 MB/s, and after working with the Solaris Engineering team we
now get
rates approaching 2GB/s. The updates needed to Solaris are part of the
Solaris 10 U3 available in October (and already in Solaris Express, aka
Solaris
Josh,
On 9/14/06 8:47 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've obtained 1,950 MB/s using Linux software RAID on SATA drives.
With what? :)
Sun X4500 (aka Thumper) running stock RedHat 4.3 (actually CentOS 4.3) with
XFS and the linux md driver without lvm. Here is a summary of the
I'm experiment with RAID, looking for an inexpensive way to boost performance.
I bought 4 Seagate 7200.9 120 GB SATA drives and two SIIG dual-port SATA cards.
(NB: I don't plan to run RAID 0 in production, probably RAID 10, so no need to
comment on the failure rate of RAID 0.)
I used this
Craig A. James wrote:
I'm experiment with RAID, looking for an inexpensive way to boost
performance. I bought 4 Seagate 7200.9 120 GB SATA drives and two SIIG
dual-port SATA cards. (NB: I don't plan to run RAID 0 in production,
probably RAID 10, so no need to comment on the failure rate of
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:05, Craig A. James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiment with RAID, looking for an inexpensive way to boost
performance. I bought 4 Seagate 7200.9 120 GB SATA drives and two SIIG
dual-port SATA cards. (NB: I don't plan to run RAID 0 in production,
probably
Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:05, Craig A. James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiment with RAID, looking for an inexpensive way to boost
performance. I bought 4 Seagate 7200.9 120 GB SATA drives and two SIIG
dual-port SATA cards. (NB: I don't plan to run RAID 0 in
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:35, Craig A. James wrote:
Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:05, Craig A. James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiment with RAID, looking for an inexpensive way to boost
performance. I bought 4 Seagate 7200.9 120 GB SATA drives and two SIIG
Josh,
On 9/14/06 11:49 AM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am assuming linux here, Linux software raid 0 is known not to be super
duper.
I've obtained 1,950 MB/s using Linux software RAID on SATA drives.
- Luke
---(end of
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Josh,
On 9/14/06 11:49 AM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am assuming linux here, Linux software raid 0 is known not to be super
duper.
I've obtained 1,950 MB/s using Linux software RAID on SATA drives.
With what? :)
- Luke
--
=== The
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Josh,
On 9/14/06 8:47 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've obtained 1,950 MB/s using Linux software RAID on SATA drives.
With what? :)
Sun X4500 (aka Thumper) running stock RedHat 4.3 (actually CentOS 4.3) with
XFS and the linux md driver without lvm.
14 matches
Mail list logo
