Robert Haas writes:
> Gee, I wonder if it would possible for PG to automatically do an
> asynchronous commit of any transaction which touches only temp tables.
Hmm ... do we need a commit at all in such a case? If our XID has only
gone into temp tables, I think we need to write to clog, but we d
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 10/26/10 17:41, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Leonardo Francalanci
>> wrote:
temp tables are not wal logged or
synced. Periodically they can be flushed to a permanent table.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 10/26/10 17:41, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Leonardo Francalanci
>> wrote:
temp tables are not wal logged or
synced. Periodically they can be flushed to a permanent table.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you
On 10/26/10 17:41, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Leonardo Francalanci
> wrote:
>>> temp tables are not wal logged or
>>> synced. Periodically they can be flushed to a permanent table.
>>
>>
>> What do you mean with "Periodically they can be flushed to
>> a permanen
