Re: [PERFORM] SRFs ... no performance penalty?

2003-10-21 Thread Josh Berkus
Robert, > > 1) 0.19687 seconds > > 2) 0.20667 seconds > > 3) 0.20594 seconds > > Is this measuring time in the back-end or total time of script > execution? Total time of execution, e.g. from clicking the "enter" button to displaying the list of matches. Any other comparison would be misleading

Re: [PERFORM] SRFs ... no performance penalty?

2003-10-21 Thread Robert Treat
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 20:55, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > I'm working on the demo session for our upcoming presentation at PHPCon. > > As a side issue, we ended up comparing 3 versions of the same search screen: > > 1) All in PHP with views; > 2) Using a function to build a query and count

[PERFORM] SRFs ... no performance penalty?

2003-10-20 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, I'm working on the demo session for our upcoming presentation at PHPCon. As a side issue, we ended up comparing 3 versions of the same search screen: 1) All in PHP with views; 2) Using a function to build a query and count results but executing that query directly and sorting, paging i