Jan Otto wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Aug 22, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Mathias Stjernström wrote:
I Agree with Robert but i never heard of Cybercluster before. Does
anyone have any experience with Cybercluster? It sounds really
interesting!
Some months ago i took a look into cybercluster. At that point
Hi Mathias,
On Aug 22, 2008, at 8:35 AM, Mathias Stjernström wrote:
I Agree with Robert but i never heard of Cybercluster before.
Does anyone have any experience with Cybercluster? It sounds really
interesting!
Some months ago i took a look into cybercluster. At that point
cybercluster wa
Dan Harris wrote:
> My desire would be to have a parallel server that could act as a hot
> standby system with automatic fail over in a multi-master role.
I will add my "me too" for DRBD + Heartbeat.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
I Agree with Robert but i never heard of Cybercluster before.
Does anyone have any experience with Cybercluster? It sounds really
interesting!
Best regards,
Mathias Stjernström
http://www.pastbedti.me/
On 22 aug 2008, at 08.18, RW wrote:
My company finally has the means to install a new
Yup, but sometimes you are not in charge of the DDL changes. You may
have many different users that make changes or for example if you are
working with Ruby On Rails you have something thats called Migrations
that handles all DDL changes in those situations it can get really
complicated wit
My company finally has the means to install a new database server for
replication. I have Googled and found a lot of sparse information out
there regarding replication systems for PostgreSQL and a lot of it
looks very out-of-date. Can I please get some ideas from those of you
that are curre
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:54:11 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Drake wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:21:26 +0200
> > Mathias Stjernström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a
> > > automatic way. You have to execute
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Mathias Stjernstr?m wrote:
Hi Dan!
Its true, many of the replication options that exists for PostgreSQL have not
seen any updates in a while.
If you only looking for redundancy and not a performance gain you should look
at PostgreSQL PITR
(http://www.postgresql.org/doc
Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:21:26 +0200
> Mathias Stjernström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a automatic
> > way. You have to execute all DDL changes with a separate script.
> >
> > What's the status of
> > http://www.com
On Thursday 21 August 2008, salman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mathias Stjernström wrote:
> > Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a automatic way.
> > You have to execute all DDL changes with a separate script.
>
> That's true, but it's quite simple to do with the provided perl
Mathias Stjernström wrote:
Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a automatic way.
You have to execute all DDL changes with a separate script.
That's true, but it's quite simple to do with the provided perl
script(s) - slonik_execute_script. I've had to make use of it a few
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:21:26 +0200
Mathias Stjernström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a automatic
> way. You have to execute all DDL changes with a separate script.
>
> What's the status of
> http://www.commandprompt.com/products/mammothrepli
Yes thats true. It does support DDL changes but not in a automatic
way. You have to execute all DDL changes with a separate script.
What's the status of http://www.commandprompt.com/products/mammothreplicator/
?
Best regards,
Mathias
http://www.pastbedti.me/
On 21 aug 2008, at 23.04, And
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Dan Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Especially since we make frequent use of sequences in our databases. If
> MM is too difficult, I'm willing to accept a hot-standby read-only
> system that will handle queries until we can fix whatever ails the
> master.
A heartbe
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Mathias Stjernström wrote:
> For Master-Slave replication i think that Slony http://www.slony.info/ is
> most up to date. But it does not support DDL changes.
This isn't quite true. It supports DDL; it just doesn't support it in
the normal way, and is b
Hi Dan!
Its true, many of the replication options that exists for PostgreSQL
have not seen any updates in a while.
If you only looking for redundancy and not a performance gain you
should look at PostgreSQL PITR (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html
)
For Master-S
My company finally has the means to install a new database server for
replication. I have Googled and found a lot of sparse information out
there regarding replication systems for PostgreSQL and a lot of it looks
very out-of-date. Can I please get some ideas from those of you that
are current
17 matches
Mail list logo
