Re: [PERFORM] Update on putting WAL on ramdisk/

2003-12-12 Thread William Yu
Russell Garrett wrote: WAL on single drive: 7.990 rec/s WAL on 2nd IDE drive: 8.329 rec/s WAL on tmpfs: 13.172 rec/s A huge jump in performance but a bit scary having a WAL that can disappear at any time. I'm gonna workup a rsync script and do some power-off experiments to see how badly it gets man

Re: [PERFORM] Update on putting WAL on ramdisk/

2003-12-12 Thread Russell Garrett
> WAL on single drive: 7.990 rec/s > WAL on 2nd IDE drive: 8.329 rec/s > WAL on tmpfs: 13.172 rec/s > > A huge jump in performance but a bit scary having a WAL that can > disappear at any time. I'm gonna workup a rsync script and do some > power-off experiments to see how badly it gets mangled. Su

[PERFORM] Update on putting WAL on ramdisk/

2003-12-12 Thread William Yu
Some arbitrary data processing job WAL on single drive: 7.990 rec/s WAL on 2nd IDE drive: 8.329 rec/s WAL on tmpfs: 13.172 rec/s A huge jump in performance but a bit scary having a WAL that can disappear at any time. I'm gonna workup a rsync script and do some power-off experiments to see how ba